![]() Mint's default kernel can lag behind other distros by up to three years! This could cause problems with hardware compatibility if you plan on using newer components in your system.It's unlikely to hit you with radical changes to its software, making it easier to stick to one way of doing things.Like Ubuntu, Mint has a massive user base and a highly-active community willing to provide support for any problems you come across.Reliable, stable, community-driven platform that is easy to build on.On the other hand, it's a remarkably stable Linux distro that doesn't need as much tinkering as the others as long as you keep your activities simple. Compared to the latest (kind of) stable 1.10.0 version, this one lacks some important menu options and its navigation is less intuitive. The downside of this is that some features you might be used to in some apps might not be there.įor example, RetroArch (a popular game emulation hub) on Linux Mint appears as version 1.7.3, and the package manager compartmentalizes a lot of the assets available to the program. Linux Mint is a Debian-based distribution that prides itself on following the mantra of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Every single package in its repositories, including the flagship Cinnamon desktop it ships with, is meant to be for the long haul, prompting an upgrade only when absolutely necessary. Unless you're using the most cutting-edge hardware, much of what you get in newer kernels and software isn't absolutely necessary. The numerous customization options in Plasma can lead to choice fatigue for new users.Īlso read: The Best Linux Desktop Environments of 2022 2.Ubuntu's higher system overhead is still present in Kubuntu.KDE's "Discover" gives you a cleaner and more modern UI than Ubuntu's default software manager.The inclusion of KDE Plasma by default provides a clean platform to work with and minimizes some of the application crossover that happens when installing a Plasma over Ubuntu's default GNOME.Straight-up Ubuntu with a different desktop environment.It throws so much at you that you may be overwhelmed by the sheer amount of things you can do. Our journey has ultimately reinforced our belief that incremental changes are better manageable than big bang releases.One caveat: If you're accustomed to working with Ubuntu and GNOME, you might find the KDE style of doing things to be a bit unsettling at first. ![]() "Being in control of our own moving target and baseline has helped to slow down whenever we encountered too many problems and broke any of our team. What the change has confirmed for Google is that incremental changes beat big bang releases. The company also urges others thinking of implementing rolling releases to "balance the needs of the company against upgrade agility". Google says it does plan to work more closely with upstream Debian and contribute more of its internal patches to maintain the Debian package ecosystem. SEE: How to enable Linux on your Chromebook (and why you should) ![]() ![]() "Our rolling release schedule makes sure we patch security holes on the entire fleet quickly without compromising on stability, while previously security engineers had to carefully review each DSA and make sure the fix has made it to our fleet." "While Debian provides a good source of security patches for the stable and oldstable tracks, we realized that not every security hole that gets patches, necessarily has a Debian Security Advisory (DSA) or CVE number," the engineers note. Google says it has also "dramatically improved our security stance by operating our fleet closer to upstream releases." A rolling-release Linux is constantly being updated with the idea that users and developers are best served by giving them the latest updates and patches as they're created. For similar reasons, Linux distributions like Arch Linux and NixOS have implemented rolling releases too. Google designed gLinux Rodete (Rolling Debian Testing) with the aim of killing the two-year upgrade cycle and rolling it out over time to reduce the load on engineers.Īs they note, the software industry's general move to CI/CD (continuous integration/continuous development) has shown that smaller incremental changes are easier to control and roll back. Running off an LTS version also meant that some bugs encountered by users of our distribution might've already been fixed upstream, but those improvements might've never been backported to the LTS version." "Once one upgrade was done there was a general sense of being "close to burnout" in the team that we barely could recover from until the next round of updates came about. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |